home
> about > whiteflies
| TAXONOMY |
ORDER: Hemiptera, SUBORDER: Sternorrhyncha,
SUPERFAMILY: Aleyrodoidea, FAMILY: Aleyrodidae
Two subfamilies: Aleurodicinae (found mainly in South
America), Aleyrodinae (larger and more widespread);
third tentative: Udamoselinae (insufficient data to
determine status) (Mound and Halsey 1978).
"The species included in the hemipterous family
Aleyrodidae were first catalogued by Kirkaldy in 1907
and a checklist of species was also provided by Quaintance
in 1908. Kirkaldy refers to 150 species in two genera,
whilst Quaintance refers to 156 species in three genera.
The basis for the present generic classification was
laid by Quaintance & Baker (1913-14) who divided
the group into three subfamilies, including one, four
and eighteen genera, respectively. Since then large
numbers of species and genera have been described.
. . . " (Mound & Halsey 1978).
|
| STATUS |
Most species of whiteflies are monophagous (feed
on only one host plant). However, a few species are
oligophagous or polyphagous.
Some whitefly species can be agricultural pests and
vectors of plant viruses.
Whiteflies cause damage to plants by feeding on
phloem sap. They also excrete a sugar-rich substance
called 'honeydew', which at times encourages the development
of sooty mold fungi that reduce the plants' photosynthetic
capability.
The emergence of new, aggressive biotypes or variants
has presented new challenges to disease and pest control.
Currently, quarantine of infested plant materials
is an important means of preventing the introduction
and dispersal of new whitefly species.
|
| DISTRIBUTION |
Are major agricultural pests and vectors in subtropical
and tropical zones, mediterranean climates, and in greenhouses
in temperate locales.
|
| LIFECYCLE AND MORPHOLOGY |
Adult whiteflies measure from 1 -
3 mm in length, are four-winged and fully mobile with
a feeding rostrum and seven-segmented antennae. "Forewing
venation is reduced to a simple or once-branched major
vein" (Martin and others 2000).
Reproduction can be sexual or parthenogenic. Unmated
females (2N) produce male offspring (1N), and fertilized
eggs yield female offspring (2N). Eggs are oviposited
on the leaf or other plant surfaces.
"First instar larvae are minute but have relatively
long legs and antennae. They can crawl actively although
they probably do not leave the leaf on which they
have hatched. The legs and antennae of the second,
third and fourth instar are atrophied, and these instars
are sessile. The adult develops within the fourth
instar and this is then known as the pupal case. Many
species produce large quantities of wax around the
margins and on the dorsal surface of the larvae, and
in a few species the cast skins of earlier instars
may be found on the dorsal surface of a pupal case.
In most species the adult emerges through a T-shaped
split in the dorsal surface of the pupal case, but
in a few species the apices of the T are joined by
additional sutures thus forming a 'trap-door.' Pupal
cases from which parasites have emerged can be recognized
by an irregular circular hole which is chewed by the
emerging parasite.
The white powdery wax that covers the body of most
species in this family is secreted from abdominal
glands after the adult has emerged from its pupal
case. Some species have dark spots on the wings, although
these may not develop until a few hours after emergence,
and a few species are not white. The Citrus Blackfly,
Aleurocanthus woglumi, has black wings and
little wax, and several species of Aleurodicinae have
patterned wings. An undescribed species of Dialeurodes
on coffee in southern Nigeria has red wings,
and Bemisia
giffardi has very pale yellow wings (Mound
and Halsey 1978).
click to view life cycle diagram
|
| IDENTIFICATION |
The generic classification of the
Aleyrodidae is based on the structure of the fourth
larval instar, the so-called pupal case, not on the
structure of adults. This has the great advantage
that since the pupal cases are sessile it is possible
to collect and identify host plants with the insects.
Unfortunately some polyphagous whitefly species vary
in the appearance of their pupal cases depending on
the form of the host plant cuticle on which they develop.
This variation has caused a significant amount of
misidentification, and so deductions from host plant
associations must always be approached with caution."
(Mound and Halsey 1978).
"Morphologically the aleyrodids seem to be degenerate
psyllids, although ecologically they are the tropical
equivalent of aphids--opportunist insects with transient
populations. The feeding apparatus is similar to that
of the other Sternorryncha, but in contrast to psyllids
the antennae have fewer segments and the forewings
fewer veins" (Mound and Halsey 1978).
Significantly, Russell (1957) found that many species
of whitefly had been misidentified, and re-classified
two genera and twelve Bemisia species as
B. tabaci (Gennadius). Morphological differentiation
of pupae is one of the better methods for determining
identity of species (Martin and others 2000). However,
molecular analysis is the only effective means of
confirming the identity of genetic variants or subspecies
of B. tabaci (Brown 2000, Brown and others
1995, Frohlich and others 1999, Rosell and others
1997).
"Martin (1987) produced an identification guide
to common whitefly pest species of the world, which
can be used to distinguish B. tabaci from
other whiteflies (although for this particular identification
it is necessary to work through the entire key to
reach B. tabaci). Bohmer (1989) gave details
of how to separate B. tabaci and Trialeurodes
vaporariorum (Westwood), the two common European
glasshouse whitefly pests (Cock 1993). Caballero (1994),
using photographs of pupae, developed a reference
key of whiteflies in Central American, and Gill (no
date) developed a similar key for whiteflies common
to California.
|
| PLANT HOSTS |
"The majority of whiteflies colonize only dicotyledonous
angiosperms and a smaller, but significant, number feed
on monocots, particularly grasses and palms (Martin
and others 2000)."
|
| VECTOR SPECIES |
Presently, three whitefly species,
B. tabaci, T. vaporariorum (West.),
or T. abutiloneus (Haldeman), are known to
be vectors of plant viruses, while B. tabaci
is the most important, having been associated with
more than 100 viral diseases in the tropics and subtropics
(Nault, 1997).
B. tabaci is typically polyphagous and is
generally found in tropical and semi-tropical regions.
It vectors begomoviruses, criniviruses (Lettuce
infectious yellows virus, Cucurbit yellow stunting
disorder virus (also transmitted by B and Q biotypes),
Lettuce chlorosis virus, Pumpkin yellow mosaic virus,
Sweetpotato sunken vein virus, Sweetpotato chlorotic
stunt virus and Tomato chlorosis virus (also
transmitted by B and Q biotypes)), two carlaviruses
(Cassava brown streak virus and Cowpea
mild mottle virus) and poty-like virus (Squash
yellow leaf curl virus) and a member of the tentative
new genus Impovirus
(Sweetpotato mild mottle virus)
(Brown and Czosnek 2001).
T. vaporariorum is polyphagous and found
nearly worldwide because it inhabits greenhouses
as well as field crops. It transmits criniviruses
(Beet pseudo-yellows virus, Potato yellow vein
virus, Tomato infectious chlorosis virus and
Tomato chlorosis virus) and potyviruses (Brown
and Czosnek 2001).
T. abutiloneus is the only reported whitefly
vector of Dioda vein chlorosis virus (Brown
and Czosnek 2001).
Two species within the Bemisia genera, B.
afer and B. tabaci contain several species,
variants or biotypes. The B. afer group
includes B. berbericola and B. tuberculata,
while the tabaci complex includes only tabaci
and graminus as well as several biotypes
(Gill 1994): the Jatropha (Bird 1957), Sida (Bird
1957), 'A' (Costa and Brown 1991), 'B' (Costa and
Brown 1991) (also known as B. argentifolii Bellows
and Perring), and 'Q,' among others (Bedford and others
1994; Costa and others 1993; Guirao and others 1997).
"The first known record for B. tabaci
in Hawaii was a collection made in 1982. While these
specimens have not been located, a collection made
in California from Hawaii in 1984 is available for
study, and these specimens agree morphologically with
[the B biotype] (Gill 1994). The 'B' biotype was soon
thereafter recognized in greenhouse and field crops
in Arizona, Florida, California, and Texas; and is
rapidly infesting areas in both the New and Old Worlds.
(Gill 1992 and 1994).
|
REFERENCES CITED |
Bedford ID, Markham PG, Brown JK,
Rosell RC. (1994). Geminivirus transmission and biological
characterization of whitefly (Bemisia tabaci)
biotypes from different world regions. Annals of Applied
Biology 125: 311-325.
Brown JK. (2000). Molecular markers for the identification
and global tracking of whitefly vector-begomovirus
complexes. Virus Research 71:233-260.
Brown JK, Czosnek H. (2001). Whitefly transmitted
viruses. Advances in Botanical Research, NY: Academic,
65-100.
Brown JK, Frohlich D, Rosell R. (1995). The sweetpotato/silverleaf
whiteflies:
biotypes
of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.),
or a species complex? Annual Review of Entomology
40: 511-534.
Caballero R. (1994). Clave de campo para immaduros de
moscas blancas de Centroamerica (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae).
Escuela Agricola Panamericana, Zamorano, Honduras, 4p.
Cock MJW. (1993) Bemisia tabaci, an update
1986-1992 on the cotton whitefly with an annotated bibliography.
CAB IIBC, Silwood Park, UK, 78p.
Costa HS, Brown JK. (1991). Variation in biological
characteristics and in esterase patterns among populations
of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) and the association
of one population with silverleaf symptom development.
Entomologia experimentalia et applicata 61:211-219.
Costa HS, Brown JK, Sivasupramaniam S, Bird J. (1993).
Regional distribution, insecticide resistance, and
reciprocal crosses between the `A' and `B' biotypes
of Bemisia tabaci. Insect Science and Application
14:127-138.
Frohlich D, Torres-Jerez I, Bedford ID, Markham PG,
Brown JK. (1999). A phylogeographic analysis of the
Bemisia tabaci species complex based on mitochondrial
DNA markers. Molecular Ecology 8:1593-1602.
Gill RJ. (1994). A preliminary report on the World
species of Bemisia and its congeners, with
an analysis of environmentally driven morphology shifts
and their effects on the stability of the species.
Unpublished.
Gill RJ. (1992.) A review of the sweet potato whitefly
in southern California. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 68:144-152.
Gill RJ. (1990). The morphology of whiteflies. In:
Gerling D (Editor) Whiteflies: their bionomics, pest
status, and management. Andover, Hants, UK: Intercept:
13-46.
Gill RJ. (no date) Color-photo and host keys to California
whiteflies. State of California, Department of Food
and Agriculture.
Guirao P, Beitia F, Cenis JL. (1997). Biotype determination
of Spanish populations of Bemisia tabaci
(Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Bulletin of Entomological
Research 87: 587-593.
Martin JH, D Mifsud and C Rapidsarda. (2000). The
whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) of Europe and
the Mediterranean Basin. Bulletin of Entomological
Research 90: 407-448.
Mound LA, Halsey SH. (1978). Whitefly of the world:
A systematic catalogue of the Aleyrodidae (Homoptera)
with host plant and natural enemy data. British Museum
(Natural History): Chichester. 329p.
Nault, L. (1997). Arthropod transmission of plant
viruses: a new synthesis. Annals of the Entomological
Society of America 90: 521-541.
Rosell, RC, Bedford, ID, Frohlich DR, Gill RJ, Brown
JK, Markham PG. (1997). Analysis of morphological
variation in distinct populations of Bemisia tabaci
(Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Annals of the Entomological
Society of America 90: 575-589.
Russell LM. (1957). Synonyms of Bemisia tabaci
(Gennadius) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Bulletin of
the Brooklyn Entomological Society 52: 122-1123. |
|

|